Yep....32 freakin cores.
Tom's hardware
Basically, it looks like they're planning a massive redesign of how processors are currently put together. Good for them.
| ClanKiller.com https://forums.plasmasky.com/ |
|
| Intel developing 32 core processor https://forums.plasmasky.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1917 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Satis [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Intel developing 32 core processor |
Yep....32 freakin cores. Tom's hardware Basically, it looks like they're planning a massive redesign of how processors are currently put together. Good for them.
|
|
| Author: | ElevenBravo [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I look for the Mach razor to have 32 blades by 2010. The closest shave ever! |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
yea...because we all know, the more blades the better. Oh wait, we don't know that. In fact, there's probably not a shread of proof to that. In fact, 99% of the things we hear on television is probably complete fabrication. In fact, I think I'm going to go to Canada, shoot me a moose, and turn it into the world's closest shave. MooseRazors! Because a Moose Makes the Closest Shave! Buy them now at any quality retailer for less than $1000. |
|
| Author: | derf [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
New revolutionary shaving techology... The Gillette Mach X: 
With shaving gel: 
|
|
| Author: | ElevenBravo [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
In all honesty though, the mach 4 > all razors. I love it. I love it better than the mach 3. Also, I guess I should invest some stock in intel.. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I wouldn't invest too fast...AMD has certainly caused them alot of pain up till now. And I have a Mach 3 which I like. I just think the whole adding more and more blades thing is silly as shit. |
|
| Author: | ElevenBravo [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:10 pm ] | |||||||||
| Post subject: | ||||||||||
When you have a face of sandpaper, like me, four blades is better. Im sure for a baby face likes yours you only need one blade. 
|
||||||||||
| Author: | Satis [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I thought you liked my face soft like a baby's butt? I mean...what're you talking about? |
|
| Author: | derf [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
11b prefers him men rough. |
|
| Author: | Rinox [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The only certainty when it comes to razors is that real men shave witha blade. Electric shaving is for the weak. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
electric shavers are for the lazy I use one to trim up real quick when I don't feel like lathering up and shaving iwth my razor. I also used it in the army when I was in the field. That's much better than trying to shave using ice cold water. |
|
| Author: | derf [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I though electic razors were for the non-lazy. I cant use them cos i always let it grow a little, and so if i use an electric, it acts more like a plucker. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
you must be using a cheap razor. The more expensive ones tend to be alot easier on the face than the cheaper $30 razors. Those will eat your skin. |
|
| Author: | Rinox [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:24 am ] | |||||||||
| Post subject: | ||||||||||
Why did you bother to shave in the field in the first place? Or was it mandatory?
|
||||||||||
| Author: | derf [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Probably hygene reasons. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
