ClanKiller.com
https://forums.plasmasky.com/

The Fallout 3 topic
https://forums.plasmasky.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2178		 Page 1 of 21
Author:  Peltz [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:59 am ]
Post subject:  The Fallout 3 topic
Well guys, if you see anything or hear anything about the notorius Fallout sequel, do share with the rest of us.

Gamespots rumour control

Quote:
Avoiding any mention of a platform, Howard continued, "We have pretty long preproduction phases on our stuff doing concepts, design, building prototypes, and such." He then dropped a tidbit more tantalizing to Fallout fans than fresh iguana-on-a-stick: "We should be ready soon to show it off, but we'll see."
Author:  pevil [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:07 am ]
Post subject: 
Here's one for ya, its been listed in the 'coming soon' listing at work since i first joined... 3 years ago. lol. Probably the oldest listing in there, along with Duke Nukem.
Author:  Peltz [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:22 am ]
Post subject: 
Im quite sure Bethesda delivers what they promise but the question remains, in what form.
Author:  Rinox [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:50 am ]
Post subject: 
You mean, isometric or 1st person 3d? :)

My only hope is that they can capture the grittiness and the eery atmosphere.
Author:  derf [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:41 am ]
Post subject: 
I wont be expecting anything of quality from Bethesda.
Author:  Rinox [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:50 am ]
Post subject: 
Bah, you jaded fool! *hits you over the head with Oblivion CE box* ;)
Author:  pevil [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:58 am ]
Post subject: 
Actually unless its more Elder Scrolls, I wouldn't either. Pirates of the Carribean and Star Trek game that recently came out were both huge flops. Pirates, well fair enough its a movie game and they're destined to be on the Deal of the Week from day one, it happens with them all, but the Star Trek game had no excuse.

Beth just can't deliver right now.... maybe coz they're working on the Obliv expansion ;) rofl
Author:  Satis [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:09 am ]
Post subject: 
The star trek game really sucked, btw. :)
Author:  pevil [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:05 am ]
Post subject: 
^ point proven. hehe
Author:  Peltz [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:25 am ]
Post subject: 
But then again, every star trek game ever made has sucked, so its nothing new really.
Author:  Satis [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
not this bad. Some of the starfleet command games were ok...at least it was fun flying around blowing up crap. This one just sucks really bad,
Author:  Rinox [ Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:44 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'm not a trekkie dork like Satis (hehehe) but I've played a few of the older ones and they don't all suck no..in fact, one of them was actually pretty good. I forgot the name but it was a shooter/adventure type of game.

But I hope Bethesda's crap releases aren't an indication of the quality of Fallout 3. :P
Author:  Satis [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:21 am ]
Post subject: 
yea, you know it, I'm a total trekkie. I walk around with Spock ears and a red starfleet uniform. :roll: Anyway, I think Bethesda is taking a serious nose dive with game quality.
Author:  Peltz [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:01 pm ]
Post subject: 
But they really have to outdo themselves to become as bad as SOE or EA.
Author:  Rinox [ Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:06 am ]
Post subject: 
Satis wrote:
yea, you know it, I'm a total trekkie. I walk around with Spock ears and a red starfleet uniform. :roll: Anyway, I think Bethesda is taking a serious nose dive with game quality.



I found out what the deal is with the star trek game: it was produced by bethesda, but not developed by them (by Mad Doc Software). So that explains the quality thing.

Things get confusing when a firm is both a producer and a developer. :roll:
Page 1 of 21 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/