ClanKiller.com :: View topic - Another Top 100 Games List

Peltz: i think i understand why you attacked that article, its because they didnt set the rules for compiling that list.

Peltz: they should've done like top100 with ten categories like rpg, rts, tps, fps, etc and then claim either 10 most influential or 10 genre defining or 10 most beatiful a la, etc, yada, bla bla

Derfmeister: yeah thats a big part of my reason

Derfmeister: a list based on everyones emotions is useless to me

PC Gamer Top 100 is live
Yes, we're here, and we're online. You're now able to vote for your favourite PC games of all time, via our site. If you discover we've missed off one of your favourite games, then, sure we fail. But don't let our failure stop you: email [email protected] and we'll add your favourites to our database as quickly as possible.

What about C&C? That defined the RTS genre.

Author:	derf [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:12 am ]
Post subject:	Another Top 100 Games List
As per todays RPS blog: http://www.pcgamertop100.com/editorial/ I think this list is generally fucked up beyond all recognition of reality. Let's look at the Top-10: 1. Deus Ex 2. HL2 3. TF2 4. HL 5. Rome TW 6. Oblivion 7. Fallout 8. PS Torment 9. Theif II 10. FO3 I generally have fundamental idealogical issues with putting games in order from 1-10, let alone 1-100... but they've fucked up the grouping all together. Let's assume games in the 1-10 range are implied as "class A" games... Deus Ex and HL I agree with, but why the fuck is HL2 in the same group (let alone higher) than the original? Same deal with Rome... Shogun or Medieval 1 were the ground breakers. When you categorise things, you need to do so with a certain rule-set or adherence to a criteria. One of those criteria for me is acknowledgement of the conceptual origin or predecessors for the purposes of identifying originality, innovation, bandwagon-ing. It seems this games list has totally disregarded that. TF2 is a joke in the top 10. Oblivion well, im sure you all know my opinion on Oblivion, but Morrowind is a top 10 game, not it's graphical upgrade. Fallout, fair play, although questionable. Fallout 3 another fucking utter joke. Theif II, never played it, can't comment. Planescape, I would think BG2 or 1 is more worthy. The problems continue and perhaps get worse from the #10 ranking and below... e..g 11-20: 11. UFO: Enemy Unknown (X:COM in the US): Never played 12. Civilization IV: Wtf?!?!? Civ 2 is the king of Civ games. 13. Counter-Strike: Source: Maybe... but probably not #13 14. World of Warcraft... If it's the biggest MMO, yes. But i've never played it. 15. Grand Theft Auto IV: You are fucking joking. 16. System Shock 2: Never played 17. Portal: You are having a fucking laugh 18. Unreal Tournament 2004: Consoles FTW 19. Hitman: Blood Money: Good game, but not top 40, not #19! 20. World of Goo: wtf?! I'm a fucking Nazi when it comes to critique.

Author:	Arathorn [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:
The problem of sequels vs their originals in these lists is not as simple as you state. If the ground-breaking Shogun and Medieval I are more important than Rome, why would you place CivII on the list instead of the first Civilization? Those two games are quite similar, and of course the first is more original. Personally I think that Civ IV including expansions is a greater game than Civ II (it's just that its initial buggy release put me off that game for a year), so why shouldn't it be on the list? Now I did spend (or waste) more time of my life on II than IV, but that's mainly because back in the day, there used to be only one or two interesting games per year. Playing CivII now is pretty boring (I know I did it a few months ago).

Author:	derf [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:
That's exactly the discussion that's needed. It is possible that sequels sometimes "out-do" their predecessors. For Civ I, I wouldn't know since I never played it, so I would have to say "Civ II / Civ I (?)" to replace Rome TW, as opposed to simply Civ II. Another example, Rinox is of the opinion (afaik) that BGII > BGI, but for me that's not strictly true. I don't rank Civ IV highly at all. I've played it a fair amount including mods and expansions, but it seems just an overall re-release than a superior adaptation from a functional point of view. Of which I have no problem with re-released gloss-ups, but artistically they don't merit on their own. Of course, that's what some people probably think of Rome TW, that's its the artistic superior to Medieval / Shogun... but consider that Total War is supposed to be a somewhat sensible war strategy game, Rome introduces quite a few oddities into what war actually consists of. Rather like attempting to make a product based on capability rather than an artistic void.

Author:	Peltz [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:
Derf i would advise you to stop there. You, i, Ox or anyone else cant set percentages or points to someones personal preference to determine what is better. Those games are listed based on personal emotions gained from the games. Theres no way, no how to relate to those emotions. I have never ever felt anything like it when i completed Deus Ex, and man have i tried, i've got a game collection nearing 200 games and nothing has come even close. To me Deus Ex is nr 1 and i will probably die knowing that it was the highlight of my gaming experience. Now there is no way you can relate to that so thats why i would advise against going further on the path you are set at the moment. Its like trying to describe someone how good your first kiss was or how much better yours was. EDIT: I wish Icewind Dale 2 would reach atleast one top chart. It is probably the most underrated Infinity engine games. It is so simple and yet so incredible strategic and its uncomplicated by silly romances and fluffy animals, Its like the nerd highlight where you can create a full DnD party and just make goblins explode into chunks, i love it. (nr 2 on my list).

Author:	derf [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:37 pm ]
Post subject:
Time to lock up Peltz in some prison camp for his dissent. I know what you're saying but I do indeed factor that in. I think games are works of art, and we know art is subject to criticism. We do it with paintings, music and literature, so why not with games?

ClanKiller.com https://forums.plasmasky.com/

Another Top 100 Games List https://forums.plasmasky.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=3320	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Peltz [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:
Ah but i tend to look at them as books. I see beyond the lines and colors and special effects.

Author:	Rinox [ Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:02 am ]
Post subject:
I'm going to say the only thing Derf will ever agree on: Everything is gash. Except for L4D1 and 2, and even those I have my doubts on. No but seriously, there are some bizarre things in that list (Dragon Age at 47 for example, but Kieron told me that was because of the voting cut-off date), and I wouldn't agree with most of it obviously, but other than that it's a pretty comprehensive "Who's who" of PC gaming. As for World of Goo...20 is perhaps a bit high, but it IS an amazing game. No doubt about it. Gameplay, design, art, humor, wonderful music and even emotion, it's all there. It deserves to be in the top half of the top 100 at the very least. I'm not a total TF2 fanboy and I don't think it should be 3rd, but the amount of continued pleasure that game offers is staggering. It's consistently hilarious, with regular amazing (and free) updates, solid gameplay, tons of over-the-top humor and an amazing art direction. It's probably the best (non-co-op) MP shooter of all time.

Author:	Satis [ Fri Dec 18, 2009 6:15 am ]
Post subject:
lol @ derf going bonkers over another top 100 list. I agree that the list is crap... there are some majorly important games that don't show up in there WTF about Doom or Return to Cast Wolfenstein ffs? They defined the fps genre. What about C&C? That defined the RTS genre. GTA3? Open world. Baldur's Gate? Those lists will always be flawed. I doubt I could make a list of games I personally love in order... my loves change order depending on my mood.

Author:	Satis [ Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:41 am ]
Post subject:
heh...ok...Command and Conquer defined the RTS genre for me then. Never played Dune 2.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/