ClanKiller.com
https://forums.plasmasky.com/

I.Spy
https://forums.plasmasky.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3412
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Peltz [ Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:56 am ]
Post subject:  I.Spy

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/student-web ... -5878.html

Quote:
School Used Student Webcams to Spy on Them

Author:  Satis [ Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Yea, I saw that. Scary shit. Thankfully the school is having a class-action lawsuit filed against it. Though I hate seeing a school district deprived of money, hopefully that'll send a pretty strong message about privacy. And I hope the people behind that see jail time. Child porn anybody? It's ridiculous.

Author:  Rinox [ Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Lol. What the hell? School boards aren't usually known for their tech savvy and innovative techniques in dealing with student behavior. This is just plain weird (and freaky). Anyway, another good reason never to have cameras connected to the internet on in your home that you're not actively using. :roll:

My laptop has a built-in camera facing towards me too, and I disabled it long ago. All people would see was my face and hairy chest anyway. Occasional self-nipple-tweaking. But still...wouldn't want it broadcast in any way. :P

P.S. nipple thing was a joke

Author:  J [ Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Quite disturbing indeed although i agree it's also a bit strange, since most schools seem to be a couple of lightyears behind when it's about using technology and stuff.

I wonder how they monitored it, did they have to hire someone to watch the surveilllance cams or was there a secret lair with a gigantic wall of screens with all the webcam views or what?

Author:  Satis [ Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

The story I read stated that a kid got punished for something he did at home and they pretty much just came out and said that they had the ability to turn on the camera and spy on the kid whenever they felt like it.

here's the article
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... t-home.ars

Quote:
In November of 2009, however, Robbins was disciplined by the Assistant Principal of his school, Lindy Matsko, for engaging in "improper behavior" in his home. At that time, Matsko cited a photograph from the built-in webcam on the laptop.

Robbins' father Michael supposedly confirmed with Matsko that the school has the ability to remotely activate the webcam "at any time it chose to view and capture whatever images were in front of the webcam." Needless to say, Robbins' parents were outraged at this development, as neither the school nor the district had told parents about this capability. As a result, the Robbins have filed a class-action lawsuit against the district, charging it with interception of electronic communications under the ECPA, theft of intellectual property under the CFAA, violations of the Stored Communications Act, violations of the Civil Rights Act, invasions of privacy, and violations of the Pennsylvania wiretapping and electronic surveillance act.

Author:  Rinox [ Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Any idea what "improper behavior" at home could entail? I mean...afaik school hasn't anything to say about what their students do at home. Sure, if they smoke behind the school or masturbate on the front door I could see them getting pissed off and getting away with punishing that, but at home? Isn't that where, you know, parents are calling the shots on what they can and can't do?

If real, that's some serious big brother shit right there. :o

Author:  Satis [ Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Here's a follow up article on Ars. Looks like it's for real, btw.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... mpaign=rss

Quote:
Less than a day after Harriton High School's questionable laptop policy made headlines online, its school district has disabled its remote monitoring capabilities.


Quote:
As pointed out in the comments of our original article, a user claiming to be a recent Harriton High School graduate posted his perspective online, noting that the green light on the MacBooks' built-in webcam would come on often enough to arouse student suspicion. "Some [students] covered it up with tape and post-its because they thought the IT guys were watching them," he wrote.


The truth will probably come out as the lawsuit unfolds, unless the school district just settles.

Author:  Satis [ Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I.Spy

Looks like the FBI is now involved to see if the school violated federal anti-wiretap laws. Nice.

Quote:
The FBI is looking into whether any federal wiretap or computer-intrusion laws were violated, according to an official who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss the investigation. Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman has said she might also investigate.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00679.html

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/