The fight against piracy is a lost cause. Software companies that want to be successful need to learn how to entice customers to purchase their products rather than pirate it. The way is by providing benefits that pirated software would never get.
Stuff like content updates, live online content, software updates, network storage, basically anything that they can control directly and is hard to impossible to pirate. A content update might be pirated... but it would take awhile for a copy to leak out, get cracked, get packaged and get distributed. Other benefits could be a forum for legit serial number holders only with tons of free advice and tuts, for instance. Build a community around your product and piracy doesn't mean anything.
On the other hand, if you make your product hard to use because of cumbersome DRM, then where's the advantage of buying it versus pirating it? There isn't one... DRM doesn't work. But these guys just don't get it.
Anyway, sorry, it's a personal thing of mine. Regarding the pirate bay trial, it'll go to appeal. Sounds like the entertainment people had their way and justice wasn't served. After all, TPB didn't host any illegal content...they were just a search engine for content hosted elsewhere, much of it which was illegal but some that wasn't. Google has links to torrents in its search engine, too.
Of course, in the US, intent is a big part of breaking the law. And it's hard to argue that their intent was not to infringe copyright. With a name like The Pirate Bay and all.

I don't know about Swedish law, though that country likes to steal personal rights almost as much as the UK does.
