ClanKiller.com
https://forums.plasmasky.com/

New super-gun to be tested
https://forums.plasmasky.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1607
Page 1 of 2

Author:  ElevenBravo [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:46 am ]
Post subject:  New super-gun to be tested

http://upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.p ... 0112-5273r

Quote:
By PAMELA HESS
UPI Pentagon Correspondent

WASHINGTON, Jan. 20 (UPI) -- Next month a new high-explosive munition will be fired in Singapore and then tested again by the U.S. Army, heralding what may be a sea change in weaponry: a gun that can fire 240,000 rounds per minute.

That's compared to 60 rounds per minute in a standard military machine gun.

Author:  derf [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:46 am ]
Post subject: 

Sounds like a long-range shotgun.

Author:  Mole [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:57 am ]
Post subject: 

I have a question.

Why? What need to we have to bloody have an even more powerful weapon?

Author:  Arathorn [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:18 am ]
Post subject: 

The article mentiones intercepting incoming missiles. Imagine in Iraq, a terrorist fires an RPG towards a US patroll, but on top of their hummer there's one of these ultra guns. As soon as some warning system sees the RPG, the gun bursts a curtain of bullets towards the RPG, blowing it up before it reaches it's target.

Author:  Myrddin L'argenton [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:23 am ]
Post subject: 

I think I get mole's point- why do we really need weapons if it just makes us eventually destroy our selves?

Author:  Satis [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:24 am ]
Post subject: 

sounds lame. It's a bunch of one-shot barrels....totally useless except as where one shot is actually worth a shit. Or you strap more barrels together for more shots, but it's still lame. Comparing it to a Mk. 19 is retarded...a Mk.19 is a fully automatic, belt-fed grenade launcher...it's the freakin' pwnzor. It also only take 4 people to carry it. The gun is 50 pounds and the tripod is 50 pounds.

Anyway, my opinion is this "new article" is more propaganda from the company that's developing this "revolutionary" new gun...which isn't very revolutionary. I'm sorry to see the pentagon spending money on it.

Author:  Myrddin L'argenton [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:32 am ]
Post subject: 

Only takes four people to carry it- sounds like an old fashioned cannon.

Author:  ElevenBravo [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:58 am ]
Post subject: 

Sounds like my penis...

Author:  Mole [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:57 am ]
Post subject: 

That was my point exactly. More weapons doesn't only mean better defence for us, it means a stronger offence against us. Be it from our selves as a race, nation or specie. Or from the opressor. *looks at ox*

and I think that satis should learn mine and ox's new word, pwnager.

Which still hasn't appear at UD. *adds it again*

Author:  pevil [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

ok this is why. people are stupid. people invent stuff to protect themselves, but they're not content with protection, no, they want to kill the attacker. eventaully we'll wipe ourselves out and the world will be happy. all except the human side.

actually more likely its been invented for that girl to shoot more cars down ;)

Author:  Satis [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

meh, I'm not saying that at all. I love guns and weapons advancements. It's just that this isn't an advancement. It's just stupid.

Author:  derf [ Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:35 am ]
Post subject: 

I'd like to see a diagram or crossection of the system before judging it.

Author:  Myrddin L'argenton [ Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:53 am ]
Post subject: 

which girl?

Author:  pevil [ Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:45 am ]
Post subject: 

whatever one satis linked to shooting at cars in another thread :P

Author:  Mole [ Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yeah, that gun firing range thing. Where everyone had itchy trigger fingers.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/