It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 8:26 am



Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Smoking 
Author Message
King
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:17 am
Posts: 1717
Location: The Plateaus of Insanity
Reply with quote
Post 
Franny wrote:
drop of smoke?? it comes in liquid form now?......


ok it may only take a tiny amount of carcinogenic particles to actualy cause the cancer, but it's very unlikely that it'll be the few particles you breathe in from passive smoking while eating a meal in a resturant.
Yes if you stayed there a lot the obviously the risk is increased etc etc.

The other reason why it's banned of course is that some people just can't stand the smell or the taste of the smoke in the air, and to be honest, opinions have changed and it's not polite to smoke in a resturant etc. so i can see why people would want no smoking resturants. Why you can't allow some one to smoke in their own house, or outside where it makes so little difference to you, i'm not entirely sure.... :roll:

It's their life, let them do what they want. It's not as if there gonna commit violent crimes to get the money for cigs like they would with cocaine or anything, so does it really affect you that much it needs to be banned everywhere?

Speaking to some people I know, they would like to give up but can't, most of the time though, if you want something to be popular ban it.

_________________
I think drugs have done some really good things. If you don't believe me, go home tonight, take all your cassettes, CDs, etc and burn them. Because those artists that have made that music were real fucking high- Bill Hicks


Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:16 am
Profile
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 1:43 am
Posts: 4332
Reply with quote
Post 
ok

1. I couldn't b bothered reading everyone elses opinions lol. But I remember this exact same conversation on the original walkthrough forums.
2. No. Shouldn't be banned. As Mole knows, I hate smoking as much as he does. I just think it should be limited to private places, like your own house. Just coz I hate it means nothing. I mean, there are people who hate alcohol. I drink, but very rarely and not much. But why should alcohol be banned? So long as it isn't forced onto you it's ok, it's your choice if you want to go pickle your liver. So by the same token it's your choice to tar up your lungs. Just don't make everyone else inhale your smoke.

_________________
Image


Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:59 am
Profile WWW
King
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:17 am
Posts: 1717
Location: The Plateaus of Insanity
Reply with quote
Post 
pevil wrote:
ok

1. I couldn't b bothered reading everyone elses opinions lol. But I remember this exact same conversation on the original walkthrough forums.
2. No. Shouldn't be banned. As Mole knows, I hate smoking as much as he does. I just think it should be limited to private places, like your own house. Just coz I hate it means nothing. I mean, there are people who hate alcohol. I drink, but very rarely and not much. But why should alcohol be banned? So long as it isn't forced onto you it's ok, it's your choice if you want to go pickle your liver. So by the same token it's your choice to tar up your lungs. Just don't make everyone else inhale your smoke.

Nice point pev

_________________
I think drugs have done some really good things. If you don't believe me, go home tonight, take all your cassettes, CDs, etc and burn them. Because those artists that have made that music were real fucking high- Bill Hicks


Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:48 am
Profile
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 5:09 pm
Posts: 4004
Location: Walsall, West Mids, UK
Reply with quote
Post 
meh. Heres my POV.

Alcohol doesn't affect those around you in an immediate fashion. Addmitedly the drunk and slow of wit get agressive or foolish. which can result in the death or injury of one or more people, themselves included. But smoking - it immediatly affects those around you. I soon as my mom "lights up" i leave the room. Pev said in private places etc is ok. But by the same token, in my own home, i should surely have the right to my own safety. and the right not to be forced to breath second hand smoke. I mean... parents are always on about keeping there kids safe. but not from lung cancer?

Smoking should be banned OR there should be some kinda place to go and smoke. And before you say thats stupid, they did it with skateing in walsall (my hometown) we were a danger to other people. they built a skate park (a crap one) now if i wanna skate in town, i am banned, and HAVE to go to the skatepark. Because every where else is unsuitable, and places that seem like a good skate spot are usually private areas etc.

_________________
Games to complete:
GTA IV [100%] (For Multiplayer next!)
Fallout 3 [50%]
Rock Band [35%]
http://www.cafepress.com/SmeepProducts


Tue Sep 30, 2003 1:35 pm
Profile WWW
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post 
so, basically, you're saying they should build a park for smokers to smoke in. Are we surrounding this park with barbed wire and armed guards? How about reeducation films projected on a 500 foot tall screen?

How am I hurting ANYONE by smoking on the street? Or in my car? Or in my back yard? Smoking and driving isn't a danger (less so than drinking and driving, or talking on a cellphone and driving).

Ultimately, what gives you the right to say what I can or can't do to my own body?

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:17 pm
Profile WWW
Duke
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 7:08 am
Posts: 1012
Location: Australia!!! (country of coolness)
Reply with quote
Post 
I agree that it's up to a person to decided whether they want to smoke or not. I don't think it should be banned, because everyone knows the risks. But i do think in public places it's really unfair to have to breathe in others smoke.
My mum smokes, and i hate it. I do that same as mole, and leave the room when she lights up, or i cover my nose and mouth with my sleeve or something. But as much as i hate it, it's her decision and she tries not to smoke around me, and i know she can't help it at this point in time.
But what really shits me is when i'm walking down the street, and i walk past someone smoking, and all i breathe in is their smoke for a couple of metres.

Oh and the one thing that pisses me off the most is the people that smoke in their car and fling the butts out the window :evil:. That is the most disgusting thing ever! If your gonna smoke and put your health at risk, at least don't pollute aswell!!

hehehe... sorry, ranting again :roll:

_________________
Act your shoe size.


Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:28 pm
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post 
heh. I don't throw it out the window (unless the ash tray is full). Actually, since I bought my new car I don't smoke while driving. But anyway... I mean, I won't exhale the smoke at people that I'm walking by or anything, but what's a couple seconds of smelling dilluted smoke? There's no health risk associated with that (unless everyone you walked by smoked) and I refer back to my 'stinky person' comparison.

Blah! :x

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:44 pm
Profile WWW
Duke
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 7:08 am
Posts: 1012
Location: Australia!!! (country of coolness)
Reply with quote
Post 
:P second hand smoke is worse, at least you get to suck it through a filtre, we get the unfiltered crap lol :mrgreen:

_________________
Act your shoe size.


Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:28 pm
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post 
:/ Come now. Do you think smokers don't inhale second-hand smoke also? *grumble grumble*

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Wed Oct 01, 2003 1:48 am
Profile WWW
Super Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 2:48 pm
Posts: 892
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Reply with quote
Post 
Minor difference -

=> you want it
=> we don't.

_________________
Warcraft 3 Strategy Guide
Kings of Chaos
Image


Wed Oct 01, 2003 4:04 am
Profile
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 2:17 pm
Posts: 7737
Location: Centre of the sun
Reply with quote
Post 
Satis, your only argument seems to be "thats worse, so ban that". Youre trying to distract me from the core of the discussion which is "Ban Smoking?" ans "Why?".

I say: Ban smoking, because it does bad and no good.

You say: Dont ban it, because there are worse things to ban.

_________________
"Well a very, very hevate, ah, heavy duh burtation tonight. We had a very derrist derrison, bite, let's go ahead and terrist teysond those fullabit who have the pit." - Serene Branson


Wed Oct 01, 2003 4:32 am
Profile
King
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:17 am
Posts: 1717
Location: The Plateaus of Insanity
Reply with quote
Post 
derf_Ethiumer wrote:
Satis, your only argument seems to be "thats worse, so ban that". Youre trying to distract me from the core of the discussion which is "Ban Smoking?" ans "Why?".

I say: Ban smoking, because it does bad and no good.

You say: Dont ban it, because there are worse things to ban.

He'll probably go on about how smokers are good for the NHS and so on next

_________________
I think drugs have done some really good things. If you don't believe me, go home tonight, take all your cassettes, CDs, etc and burn them. Because those artists that have made that music were real fucking high- Bill Hicks


Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:59 am
Profile
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 10:23 am
Posts: 3956
Location: Amsterdam
Reply with quote
Post 
Well smokers are very good for the state. And what they bring in with cigarette tax I don't have to pay with other taxes.

_________________
Melchett: As private parts to the gods are we: they play with us for their sport!


Wed Oct 01, 2003 10:02 am
Profile
King
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:17 am
Posts: 1717
Location: The Plateaus of Insanity
Reply with quote
Post 
Arathorn wrote:
Well smokers are very good for the state. And what they bring in with cigarette tax I don't have to pay with other taxes.

Not to mention the stuff on cars being worse for the enviroment

_________________
I think drugs have done some really good things. If you don't believe me, go home tonight, take all your cassettes, CDs, etc and burn them. Because those artists that have made that music were real fucking high- Bill Hicks


Wed Oct 01, 2003 10:08 am
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post 
Yes, they are good for the state. And good for business. And the health care business. And the "quit smoking" businesses. :) And the gum business.

But anyway... I'm not trying to distract. I don't believe cigarette smoking should be banned because I don't think it's the government's business what someone does to themselves.

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Wed Oct 01, 2003 11:44 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.