It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:25 pm



Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
I.Spy 
Author Message
Stranger
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 1:14 pm
Posts: 6420
Location: Estonia
Reply with quote
Post I.Spy
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/student-web ... -5878.html

Quote:
School Used Student Webcams to Spy on Them

_________________
When someone asks how rich you are, quote Rinox " I don't even have a rusty nail to scratch my butt with...!"

Be well or Get Help!!


Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:56 am
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Yea, I saw that. Scary shit. Thankfully the school is having a class-action lawsuit filed against it. Though I hate seeing a school district deprived of money, hopefully that'll send a pretty strong message about privacy. And I hope the people behind that see jail time. Child porn anybody? It's ridiculous.

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:44 am
Profile WWW
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:23 am
Posts: 14892
Location: behind a good glass of Duvel
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Lol. What the hell? School boards aren't usually known for their tech savvy and innovative techniques in dealing with student behavior. This is just plain weird (and freaky). Anyway, another good reason never to have cameras connected to the internet on in your home that you're not actively using. :roll:

My laptop has a built-in camera facing towards me too, and I disabled it long ago. All people would see was my face and hairy chest anyway. Occasional self-nipple-tweaking. But still...wouldn't want it broadcast in any way. :P

P.S. nipple thing was a joke

_________________
"I find a Burger Tank in this place? I'm-a be a one-man cheeseburger apocalypse."

- Coach


Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:11 am
Profile
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:31 pm
Posts: 3343
Location: Belgium
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Quite disturbing indeed although i agree it's also a bit strange, since most schools seem to be a couple of lightyears behind when it's about using technology and stuff.

I wonder how they monitored it, did they have to hire someone to watch the surveilllance cams or was there a secret lair with a gigantic wall of screens with all the webcam views or what?

_________________
Beter een pens van het zuipen dan een bult van het werken!

~King of Thieves~


Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:17 am
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
The story I read stated that a kid got punished for something he did at home and they pretty much just came out and said that they had the ability to turn on the camera and spy on the kid whenever they felt like it.

here's the article
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... t-home.ars

Quote:
In November of 2009, however, Robbins was disciplined by the Assistant Principal of his school, Lindy Matsko, for engaging in "improper behavior" in his home. At that time, Matsko cited a photograph from the built-in webcam on the laptop.

Robbins' father Michael supposedly confirmed with Matsko that the school has the ability to remotely activate the webcam "at any time it chose to view and capture whatever images were in front of the webcam." Needless to say, Robbins' parents were outraged at this development, as neither the school nor the district had told parents about this capability. As a result, the Robbins have filed a class-action lawsuit against the district, charging it with interception of electronic communications under the ECPA, theft of intellectual property under the CFAA, violations of the Stored Communications Act, violations of the Civil Rights Act, invasions of privacy, and violations of the Pennsylvania wiretapping and electronic surveillance act.

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:26 am
Profile WWW
Minor Diety
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:23 am
Posts: 14892
Location: behind a good glass of Duvel
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Any idea what "improper behavior" at home could entail? I mean...afaik school hasn't anything to say about what their students do at home. Sure, if they smoke behind the school or masturbate on the front door I could see them getting pissed off and getting away with punishing that, but at home? Isn't that where, you know, parents are calling the shots on what they can and can't do?

If real, that's some serious big brother shit right there. :o

_________________
"I find a Burger Tank in this place? I'm-a be a one-man cheeseburger apocalypse."

- Coach


Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:18 am
Profile
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Here's a follow up article on Ars. Looks like it's for real, btw.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... mpaign=rss

Quote:
Less than a day after Harriton High School's questionable laptop policy made headlines online, its school district has disabled its remote monitoring capabilities.


Quote:
As pointed out in the comments of our original article, a user claiming to be a recent Harriton High School graduate posted his perspective online, noting that the green light on the MacBooks' built-in webcam would come on often enough to arouse student suspicion. "Some [students] covered it up with tape and post-its because they thought the IT guys were watching them," he wrote.


The truth will probably come out as the lawsuit unfolds, unless the school district just settles.

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:26 am
Profile WWW
Felix Rex
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 6:01 pm
Posts: 16701
Location: On a slope
Reply with quote
Post Re: I.Spy
Looks like the FBI is now involved to see if the school violated federal anti-wiretap laws. Nice.

Quote:
The FBI is looking into whether any federal wiretap or computer-intrusion laws were violated, according to an official who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss the investigation. Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman has said she might also investigate.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00679.html

_________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:07 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.